Skip to content
PounceFit

How to calculate body fat percentage with skinfold calipers

By PounceFit Team · Updated on

Skinfold caliper and measuring tape on a table
Photo: skamille (CC BY 2.0), via Flickr

Technical content for health and fitness professionals. It reproduces formulas and protocols published in the scientific literature, with the sources at the end of the page. It is not a recommendation and does not replace the judgment of the professional who runs the assessment.

To calculate body fat percentage with skinfold calipers, you measure the skinfolds of a protocol, add them up, apply the protocol's equation to get body density and convert density to body fat with the Siri equation: body fat (%) = (4.95 ÷ density − 4.50) × 100 (Siri, 1961). With the Jackson & Pollock 3-site protocol, for example, a 35-year-old man with a 54 mm sum comes out at 16.8% body fat (Jackson and Pollock, 1978). The result is an estimate, with an error of about 3 to 4 percentage points against the reference method (Heyward and Wagner, 2004).

Step 1: choose the protocol

Each protocol sets which skinfolds to measure and which equation to use, and was built in a specific sample. The protocols with a calculator on this site:

Protocol Skinfolds Original sample
Jackson & Pollock 7-site Chest, midaxillary, triceps, subscapular, abdomen, suprailiac and thigh Men aged 18 to 61 and women aged 18 to 55 (Jackson and Pollock, 1978; Jackson, Pollock and Ward, 1980)
Jackson & Pollock 3-site Men: chest, abdomen and thigh. Women: triceps, suprailiac and thigh Same as the 7-site studies
Guedes 3-site Men: triceps, suprailiac and abdomen. Women: thigh, suprailiac and subscapular Brazilian university students (Guedes, 1985)
Durnin & Womersley 4-site Biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac 481 men and women aged 16 to 72 (Durnin and Womersley, 1974)
Faulkner 4-site Triceps, subscapular, suprailiac and abdomen Equation published in a chapter on swimming and diving (Faulkner, 1968)

To decide between the Jackson & Pollock versions, see 3-site vs 7-site.

Step 2: measure the skinfolds

  • Measure on the right side, with the client standing and relaxed (ACSM, 2021).
  • Locate and mark each site from the standard description. The 7 sites are described in Jackson & Pollock 7-site skinfold.
  • Take at least two measurements at each site, in rotation, and use the mean; if the two differ by too much, measure again (ACSM, 2021).
  • Follow the ISAK technique for pinching and reading the caliper, which reduces the difference between measurements and between assessors (Stewart et al., 2011).

Step 3: add up the skinfolds and calculate density

Add up the means, in millimeters. The density equation depends on the protocol. For the Jackson & Pollock 3-site protocol, with S = sum of the three skinfolds and age in years (Jackson and Pollock, 1978; Jackson, Pollock and Ward, 1980):

  • Men: density = 1.10938 − 0.0008267 × S + 0.0000016 × S² − 0.0002574 × age
  • Women: density = 1.0994921 − 0.0009929 × S + 0.0000023 × S² − 0.0001392 × age

Other protocols use the logarithm of the sum, such as Guedes (1985) and Durnin and Womersley (1974). Each one's formulas are in its calculator.

Step 4: convert density to body fat

The Siri equation (1961) turns density into body fat percentage:

Body fat (%) = (4.95 ÷ density − 4.50) × 100

It assumes fixed densities for fat mass (0.90 g/cm³) and fat-free mass (1.10 g/cm³) (Siri, 1961). For groups whose fat-free mass departs from this value, such as children and older adults, specific conversion formulas exist (Heyward and Wagner, 2004).

Step 5: calculate the masses

  • Fat mass (kg) = weight × body fat (%) ÷ 100
  • Fat-free mass (kg) = weight − fat mass

Worked example

Man, 35 years old, 85 kg (187 lb), Jackson & Pollock 3-site protocol. Mean skinfolds (mm): chest 12, abdomen 24 and thigh 18.

  1. Sum: S = 12 + 24 + 18 = 54 mm; S² = 2,916.
  2. Density = 1.10938 − 0.0008267 × 54 + 0.0000016 × 2,916 − 0.0002574 × 35 = 1.10938 − 0.0446418 + 0.0046656 − 0.009009 = 1.0603948.
  3. Body fat = (4.95 ÷ 1.0603948 − 4.50) × 100 = 16.8%.
  4. Fat mass = 85 × 16.8 ÷ 100 = 14.3 kg. Fat-free mass = 85 − 14.3 = 70.7 kg.

The Jackson & Pollock 3-site calculator and the app reach 16.8%, 14.3 kg and 70.7 kg with these numbers. A 7-site example is in Jackson & Pollock 7-site skinfold.

Limits of the calculation

  • Equation error. Even with good technique, the error is about 3 to 4 percentage points against the reference method (Heyward and Wagner, 2004).
  • Population. Outside the age range and profile of the original sample, accuracy may be lower (Heyward and Wagner, 2004).
  • Technique. Site location, pinch technique and caliper all weigh on the result (Stewart et al., 2011).
  • Comparison. Results from different protocols, or from skinfolds and bioimpedance, are not comparable with each other. See bioimpedance vs skinfolds.

To read the result against reference ranges by sex and age, see ideal body fat percentage.

The calculation in PounceFit

In PounceFit, the body assessment software, the professional picks the protocol when creating the assessment and enters two measurements per skinfold; the app works out the mean, the sum, density, body fat percentage and the masses, with the same math as the calculators on this site. The app takes 10 skinfold sites and offers five protocols for new assessments: Jackson & Pollock 7-site and 3-site, Guedes, Faulkner and Durnin & Womersley. To record measurements on paper, there is the printable body assessment form.

Frequently asked questions

What is the formula for body fat from skinfolds?

Most protocols use two: a body density equation based on the skinfold sum (and, in some, age), and the Siri equation, which converts density to body fat: body fat (%) = (4.95 ÷ density − 4.50) × 100 (Siri, 1961). The Faulkner protocol is the exception: it gives the percentage directly from the sum of four skinfolds (Faulkner, 1968).

How many times should I measure each skinfold?

At least twice, rotating through the sites, and use the mean. If the two differ by too much, measure again (ACSM, 2021).

Can I switch protocols between assessments?

The results stop being comparable, because each equation was built in a different sample and has its own error (Heyward and Wagner, 2004). Keep the same protocol, the same assessor and the same caliper for reassessments.

Can I track progress with the skinfold sum alone?

Yes. The sum in millimeters tracks change without going through the equation and without its error (Heyward and Wagner, 2004).

Sources

  1. Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. British Journal of Nutrition. 1978;40(3):497-504. doi:10.1079/BJN19780152
  2. Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Ward A. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1980;12(3):175-181.
  3. Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brožek J, Henschel A, editors. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 1961. p. 223-244.
  4. Durnin JVGA, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition. 1974;32(1):77-97. doi:10.1079/BJN19740060
  5. Guedes DP. Estudo da gordura corporal através da mensuração dos valores de densidade corporal e da espessura de dobras cutâneas em universitários. Kinesis. 1985;1:183-212.
  6. Faulkner JA. Physiology of swimming and diving. In: Falls HB, editor. Exercise physiology. New York: Academic Press; 1968. p. 415-446.
  7. Heyward VH, Wagner DR. Applied body composition assessment. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004.
  8. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
  9. Stewart A, Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, de Ridder H. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Lower Hutt: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2011.